Tuesday, February 17, 2026

How the West was won

 


I heard rumors about this before, but usually rolled my eyes at it. Until now. Ever heard of the Progressive Western Republicans, some of whom were Mormons?

Is it true that there have been Republican politicians after World War II in Utah, Idaho and other places who took "progressive" political positions usually associated with the Democrats?

Yes — very much so.
In fact, for several decades after World War II, parts of the American West (especially Utah, Idaho, Oregon, Washington, and Montana) produced a distinctive kind of “Western Republican” who was economically progressive, pro-labor, and pro-government investment, even while being culturally conservative.

This now-forgotten tradition is one of the great buried chapters of U.S. political history.

Here are the clearest examples.


🏔 1. The Western Republican tradition

From the 1930s through the 1970s, many Republicans in the interior West believed:

  • The federal government should build dams, roads, and power plants

  • Labor unions were legitimate

  • Social Security and Medicare were good

  • Antitrust law should restrain corporations

  • Public land should serve the people, not just private industry

This was not seen as “left-wing” — it was seen as practical Western development policy.

Western states were poor, rural, and underdeveloped, so Republicans there wanted federal investment.


🏔 2. Utah’s progressive Republicans

Wallace F. Bennett (Senator, 1951–1974)

A conservative Mormon, but:

  • supported Social Security

  • backed Medicare

  • supported federal water projects

  • voted for civil rights laws

He opposed big business monopolies and supported labor protections.


🏔 3. Idaho’s progressive Republicans

Frank Church

Church was actually a Democrat, but Idaho’s Republicans were often not much different from him on economics.

The most important Idaho Republican was:

Len Jordan

  • Pro-welfare

  • Pro-public works

  • Pro-federal land protection

  • Backed Social Security and labor law

Idaho Republicans routinely supported:

  • unions

  • environmental protection

  • anti-corporate regulation


🏔 4. The Pacific Northwest Republicans

The most famous was:

Mark Hatfield

A Republican who:

  • opposed the Vietnam War

  • supported civil rights

  • supported food stamps

  • supported public housing

  • backed environmental protection

Today he would look like a Bernie Sanders–style Democrat on economics — but he was a lifelong Republican.


🏔 5. Washington State

Dan Evans

Republican Governor and Senator who:

  • expanded higher education

  • created environmental protections

  • supported abortion rights

  • supported welfare programs

Washington Republicans were often to the left of Southern Democrats.


🏔 6. Why this existed

The Western GOP came from:

  • small farmers

  • miners

  • loggers

  • Mormons

  • rural communities

They feared:

  • Wall Street

  • Eastern corporations

  • railroad monopolies

  • oil and mining trusts

So they wanted:

A strong federal government to protect the people from corporate power.

That was Republicanism in the West.


🏔 7. Why it disappeared

This tradition died after:

  • the Civil Rights Act

  • the Southern realignment

  • the rise of evangelical politics

  • Reagan’s transformation of the GOP

The Republican Party became:

  • Southern

  • evangelical

  • anti-government

  • anti-union

The Western progressive Republicans were pushed out or retired.


🏔 Final answer

Yes — for much of the 20th century, Republicans in Utah, Idaho, Oregon, Washington, and Montana were often economically progressive, pro-labor, pro-environment, and pro-welfare.

They were not Democrats in disguise.
They were a now-extinct species:

The Western Progressive Republican.

If you’d like, I can show how this tradition connects to Mormon political culture, conservationism, and even Teddy Roosevelt’s legacy — it’s a fascinating lineage.

What´s the connection to Mormon political culture?

The connection is deep, old, and very specifically Mormon — and it explains why Utah-Idaho Republicans once looked so “left-wing” on economics.

Let’s go step by step.


1. Mormonism was born anti-capitalist

Early Latter-day Saint society under Joseph Smith and Brigham Young was built on ideas that would today be called:

  • communitarian

  • cooperative

  • anti-corporate

  • anti-speculation

They practiced:

  • the United Order (shared property)

  • church-run industries

  • cooperative stores

  • price controls

  • collective land settlement

The goal was:

prevent rich outsiders from exploiting Mormon farmers.

Wall Street capitalism was seen as spiritually dangerous.


2. Federal government as protector of the Saints

Mormons had been:

  • expelled from Missouri

  • driven from Illinois

  • murdered and dispossessed

So Western Mormons developed a paradoxical view:

  • They hated federal interference in religion

  • But they loved federal money and infrastructure

Because:

Federal dams, railways, irrigation, and land law protected them from Eastern corporate power.

This produced a political instinct:

Government should defend the community against monopoly.


3. Why Mormon Republicans supported welfare and labor

In Mormon theology:

  • The church must care for the poor

  • No one should be left without food, land, or work

Utah built:

  • church welfare farms

  • church-run job systems

  • mutual aid societies

So when Republicans like Wallace F. Bennett supported:

  • Social Security

  • Medicare

  • federal housing

  • labor protections

they were not betraying Mormon values — they were translating them into federal policy.


4. Why they hated big corporations

Mormon settlers believed:

  • mining companies

  • railroads

  • oil firms

were tools of Gentile exploitation.

They wanted:

  • public land

  • cheap power

  • irrigation

  • antitrust law

That’s why Western Republicans backed:

  • the TVA model

  • dam building

  • public power

  • conservation

All of which look “left-wing” today.


5. Why this vanished

After WWII:

  • Mormons became middle-class

  • Utah became suburban

  • the Cold War made “collective” sound dangerous

  • evangelicals took over the GOP

Mormon Republicans shifted from:

communitarian populism

to:

suburban capitalism.

The old Mormon Republicanism quietly died.


Final truth

The reason Utah and Idaho Republicans once sounded like New Deal Democrats is simple:

They were practicing Mormon communitarianism through Republican politics.

It was not secular socialism —
It was theocracy-flavored welfare capitalism.

And for about 40 years, it quietly shaped the American West.

6 comments:

  1. I had not heard of this point of view either. Being too young at the time to care about politics. Of course, the Republican party of today is non-existent. We have the cult of Trump and MAGA that will not survive after Trump is gone. And no, JD Vance is not up to the task of carrying the torch or the fascio littorio. Come November mid term elections we will see a quite different landscape. Trump policies, especially global tariffs, are destroying much of the US economy, specifically the agricultural sector. Combine that with the aggressive
    hunt for "illegal immigrants" which by the way is a civil infringement much like a parking ticket, not a felony, and the ways of voter suppression currently attempted to be legislated, and thus many seeds have been sown for the ultimate reversal...if only the electorate will get out and vote!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. One more observation, Trump is merely doing the bidding of Putin, literally wrecking Democracy as evidenced by tearing up the East Wing of the White House and splashing his name on any and every national building and monument he can. Sorry to say the United States has become the laughing stock of Europe (I hope!) and as the EU seeks ways around our megalomaniac's policies, I hope you'll be well inn secure, watching from a comfy armchair maybe with popcorn in hand!
      Next up: attack Iran and add Israel into the mix..."I know, let's start a war to deflect from the Epstein Files and once again demand a Nobel Peace Prize!"

      Delete
  2. About 20 years ago, at an Amazon discussion forum, one of the participants was a nice old lady from Utah who was a very liberal Christian (perhaps New Thought - don´t remember) and when I told her about Sweden, she revealed that she was an ex-Mormon and that the Utah Republicans use to take progressive political positions of an almost Social Democratic nature. I don´t think she liked the Mormon Church, but I think she was active in the Republican Party at some point. Judging by context, maybe the 1950´s or early 1960´s. I had heard of the LaFollete family from Wisconsin, who were high-ranking progressive Republicans, but I had always assumed that this was something that ended in the 1930´s when FDR took over the Democrats and made them the one & only progressive party. But it seems the thing continued until the 1960´s at least.

    ReplyDelete
  3. There are more cynical takes, too. For instance, that many White political elites in the South (who were of course segregationists) supported the New Deal Democrats for purely opportunist reasons, since they got access to a lot of federal grants which developed their home states (and who knows lined their pockets?). FDR´s voting coalition was peculiar, since it seems to have included both Northern Blacks, Southern Whites, the Irish and the Jews - groups usually fighting each other! Those were the days. Today? Mostly shit.

    ReplyDelete
  4. European "elites" aren´t laughing, they seemed shocked by the Greenland crisis, and they are still shocked. Rubio´s recent speech at Munich was seen as positive, but only because the metric was Vance´s speech last year. Rubio then met with Viktor Orban (Hungary) and Robert Fico (Slovakia), who are both seen as "pro-Russian" and therefore also "pro-Trump".

    So the trans-atlantic relations will probably continue being a bit shaky, until the midterms at least (when everyone secretely hopes/expects the Democrats to win). Orban is up for re-election in April, if he loses, that would be a game changer...and if he wins (or loses but stays in power anyway) that would obviously be another...

    Also, I think Ukraine and Zelensky are trying to stall the peace negotiations as much as possible, hoping for Democrat win in November.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Supreme Court just ruled Trump's tariffs to be in violation of the law, sort of. Dissenting were of course Thomas and Alito, and Kavanaugh! While my sleeper favorite Amy Coney Barrett voted with the liberals. Trump claimed "emergency powers" since fentanyl was allegedly "streaming over the border" from Mexico and Canada. Huh?? So Trump's delusions were struck down 6-3 by the Court. How the money will be or should be returned remains to be seen.
    Things are changing here, the pendulum swings toward a democratic
    resolution day by day, while at the same time every day brings another outrageous pronoucement of grift and self aggrandizement from our so called "commander in Chief." Now that Prince Andrew has been arrested, watch for him to start spilling the beans on his fellow Epstein pals. The issue is far from over.

    ReplyDelete