Ashtar Command Book Blog : 2025

Thursday, September 18, 2025

Fuck around and find out

The James-Webb telescope continues fucking up the standard model of cosmology. Now, they discovered a black hole that´s too "early".

Therefore God. Right? :D

Your opinions don´t matter

Skeptical epistemology, pragmatic pluralism or a guru trick to declutch us from The Known? You decide.

OK, this is...bizarre. The guy originally arrested for the Charlie Kirk assassination was intentionally trying to distract the police so the real perp could get away?! He´s also a pedo. Ooookay. Did he *want* the Utah police to shoot him? A kind of failed "suicide by cop"?

Back on shore

It seems Styx is back on shore again. Never liked his "pirate" period. Here, he discusses the free speech conundrums in the wake of the Charlie Kirk assassination.

Wednesday, September 17, 2025

Falsifiable

You preach it, mama!

Mutant physiognomy

Strangest reaction to the Charlie Kirk shooting so far? But OK, it´s Edward Dutton so what did we expect...

Om Aditaye Namah

Isn´t it interesting that the Vedic religion actually has a goddess above or beyond the male deities? Aditi isn´t just the mother of the gods and somehow identical with all of reality. She is also "the cosmic order". A bit like Maat, perhaps?

“Aditi is the heavens; Aditi is the mid-region; Aditi is the mother, the father, and the son. Aditi is all the gods, Aditi is the five tribes. Aditi is whatever has been born; Aditi is whatever shall be born.”

I bow to Aditi, the Boundless Infinity!

Thank you for being here, Mr Robinson

So I´ve been watching the initial court hearing concerning the murder of Charlie Kirk. I have to say that Utah judges are almost absurdly polite. At one point, the judge actually said to the suspect: "Thank you for being here, Mr Robinson." Ahem, what...? Later, the judge "invited" the alleged killer to the next court proceeding: "Mr Robinson, I invite you to join us at that time".

I wonder if Mormons are this polite even when they execute people with firing squad? "Thank you for being here, Mr Robinson"...

A new meme?

"Well, akshually, Jainism is atheist, akshually"

Or actually not really...

Can you tell me about Jain Tantra or Jain Tantrism?

Yes — though it’s not often talked about, there is such a thing as Jain Tantra (sometimes called Jain Tantrism). It’s a fascinating and somewhat paradoxical part of Jain history, because Jainism is usually seen as the most strictly ascetic, non-esoteric, and anti-ritualist of India’s religions. But the historical record shows otherwise.

1. What is Jain Tantra?

Jain Tantra refers to the esoteric, ritual, and sometimes magical practices that developed within Jain communities, especially from the medieval period onward (roughly 8th–12th centuries CE).
It shares forms and vocabulary with Hindu and Buddhist Tantras, but adapted them to Jain metaphysics and ethics.
It includes:
- Yantras (sacred diagrams)
- Mantras invoking Jinas, yakṣas/yakṣiṇīs (guardian spirits), and cosmic powers
- Mandalas and ritual worship
- Occult rites for protection, prosperity, healing, and liberation

2. Main Features

Yakṣa–Yakṣiṇī Cults:
- Jinas (the enlightened ones) are seen as beyond worldly involvement, so Jains often directed ritual devotion toward their attendant deities (like Padmāvatī, Ambikā, Cakreśvarī).
- These beings were worshipped with Tantric-style rituals for worldly aid and protection.
Mantra Practices:
- The most famous Jain mantra is the Namokar Mantra (“I bow to the arihants, siddhas, teachers, monks, ascetics…”).
- But in Tantric texts, we also see seed syllables (bīja-mantras) and complex formulas invoking specific powers.
Yantras and Ritual Magic:
- Jain tantric manuals include diagrams used in meditation or protective magic.
- Some yantras are almost identical in form to Śaiva and Śākta ones, but with Jain deities inscribed.
Esoteric Soteriology:
- Some Jain tantras describe hidden methods to accelerate liberation, parallel to Buddhist Vajrayāna’s “swift path.”
- This often meant ritualizing ascetic ideals, not replacing them.

3. Texts and Traditions

Surviving texts include:
- Bhaktāmara Stotra (a hymn to the Jina Ṛṣabha, later expanded into tantric ritual manuals)
- Padmāvatīkalpa (ritual manual for the goddess Padmāvatī)
- Jvālāmālinīkalpa (tantras dedicated to goddess Jvālāmālinī)
- Āvaśyaka Niryukti and other commentaries include esoteric mantra interpretations.
These texts were especially cultivated among Digambara Jains in medieval South India, but Śvetāmbaras also had parallel traditions.

4. Relationship to Hindu/Buddhist Tantra

Jain Tantra clearly borrowed ritual technologies from neighboring Śaiva and Vajrayāna traditions:
- Circle rituals, mantras, mudrās, visualizations.
But it did not adopt sexual or antinomian practices that are common in Hindu Śākta Tantra. Jain discipline (ahiṃsā, strict ethics, non-violence, asceticism) was non-negotiable.
Instead, Jain Tantra reinterpreted Tantric methods within a Jain ethical framework.

5. Living Traditions

Even today, some Jain communities practice rituals to yakṣiṇīs like Padmāvatī using mantras and yantras.
Monastic orders sometimes still preserve Tantric texts (though often guarded or downplayed).
Popular worship at Jain temples often shows Tantric influence (ritual offerings, diagrams, protective mantras).

✅ Summary:
Jain Tantra is a little-known but real esoteric dimension of Jainism, blending Jain ascetic ideals with Tantric ritual technologies. It centered on yakṣa–yakṣiṇī worship, mantras, yantras, and ritual magic. While Jain philosophy stayed rigorously ascetic, Jain Tantra provided a practical, ritual way for laypeople to seek protection, prosperity, and spiritual aid within a Jain framework.

Would you like me to give you a concrete example of a Jain Tantric goddess (like Padmāvatī or Jvālāmālinī) and the way she’s invoked in mantra/yantra practice?

Who are the yaksha-yakshinis? Jainism is often described as "atheist" or "atheistic".

Excellent pair of questions — they go right to the heart of how Jainism is both very philosophically austere and yet mythically and ritually rich.

1. Yakṣa–Yakṣiṇī in Jainism

Yakṣa = male attendant spirit, Yakṣiṇī = female counterpart.
Every Tīrthaṅkara (the 24 enlightened “ford-makers” of Jainism) has a pair of divine guardians who serve as protectors of his image and devotees.
Example:
- Ṛṣabha (1st Tīrthaṅkara) → Yakṣa Gomukha & Yakṣiṇī Cakreśvarī
- Mahāvīra (24th Tīrthaṅkara) → Yakṣa Mātaṅga (or Brahmaṇyadeva) & Yakṣiṇī Ambikā
They are often depicted as semi-divine beings with superpowers, approachable for worldly aid.
In practice, they became the focus of much popular devotion, mantra, and Tantric ritual, since the Jinas themselves are aloof and beyond involvement in worldly affairs.

Functions:

Protection of temples and devotees
Granting health, wealth, fertility, protection from enemies
Acting as “bridges” between ordinary people and the transcendence of the Jinas

So they play the role of guardian angels or bodhisattva-like figures, though technically still bound by saṃsāra.

2. Why is Jainism called “atheistic”?

This can be misleading. Here’s why:

Jains do not believe in a creator God (Īśvara or Brahmā).
The universe is eternal, governed by natural laws (karma, dharma, adharma as cosmic substances).
The highest beings are the Jinas / Tīrthaṅkaras — perfected humans who attained liberation. They are worthy of worship, but they are not creators or sustainers of the cosmos.
Even gods (devas) exist in Jain cosmology — heavens full of divine beings — but all are finite, karmically bound, and mortal. They are higher in power, not higher in truth.

So Jainism is “atheistic” in the sense of denying a supreme creator God, but it is not materialist or godless:

It has an extensive pantheon of deities, spirits, and cosmic beings.
Its highest beings (the Jinas) are objects of devotion, though they are liberated humans, not gods in the theistic sense.

3. Yakṣa–Yakṣiṇī & Jain “Atheism”

This creates an interesting paradox:

Official Jain philosophy is ascetic, focused on self-effort and liberation.
In lived practice, Jainism developed a rich devotional and Tantric tradition around yakṣas and yakṣiṇīs.
These beings made Jainism accessible to ordinary people who sought worldly blessings while still revering the Jinas as ultimate ideals.

✅ Summary:

Yakṣas and Yakṣiṇīs are protective deities assigned to each Jina, worshipped for practical benefits.
Jainism is called “atheistic” because it rejects a creator God — but it still has a vast pantheon, where gods, yakṣas, and Jinas play important roles.
This combination makes Jainism a kind of devotional non-theism: no creator God, but many divine beings and intense ritual devotion.

Would you like me to give you a table of all 24 Tīrthaṅkaras with their yakṣa–yakṣiṇī pairs? It might help you see how systematized this is.

How common is Jain-Hindu syncretism? Do Jains and Hindus worship in each other´s temples?

This is a great and nuanced question, because Jainism and Hinduism have lived side by side for over 2,000 years, often sharing cultural, artistic, and ritual spaces while keeping their own doctrinal boundaries.

1. How common is Jain–Hindu syncretism?

Architecture & Temples
- Many Jain temples look almost identical to Hindu temples in style, iconography, and ritual form.
- Example: Dilwara temples at Mount Abu (Rajasthan) — Jains built them, but the architecture follows broader Hindu temple patterns.
- Sometimes Jains even worshipped in temples originally built for Hindu deities, and vice versa.
Deities Shared Across Traditions
- Some Jain yakṣiṇīs (like Ambikā, Padmāvatī, Cakreśvarī) overlap with Hindu goddesses (Ambikā ≈ Durgā, Padmāvatī ≈ Lakṣmī/Padmā).
- Jvālāmālinī has Śākta resonances.
- Certain Jain mantras and yantras look almost identical to Śaiva/Śākta Tantric ones, with only the divine names changed.
Pilgrimage Sites
- Some holy sites (like Śatrunjaya in Gujarat or Gommaṭeśvara at Śravaṇabelagola) are Jain, but Hindus often visit and revere them.
- Conversely, some Jain families visit Hindu temples for local deities, especially in rural areas.
Festivals
- Jain Paryuṣaṇa and Hindu festivals sometimes overlap in calendar and form.
- In regions like Karnataka and Gujarat, processions and fairs bring both communities together.

2. Do Jains and Hindus worship in each other’s temples?

Yes, informally and locally, quite often.
- In villages, where there may be just one temple structure, Jains and Hindus have historically shared spaces.
- Hindus sometimes pray in Jain temples — especially to yakṣiṇīs, who resemble Hindu goddesses.
- Jains may make offerings at local Hindu temples (especially to village goddesses for protection), though orthodox Jains will insist their true devotion is only to Jinas.
But there are boundaries.
- Strict Jains will not participate in animal sacrifice or blood offerings (common in some Hindu Śākta temples).
- Ritual purity rules in Jain temples are stricter — for instance, meat-eaters may be discouraged from entering, and menstruating women traditionally excluded.
- Theologically, Jains reject the idea of a creator god, so their visits to Hindu temples are often framed as “cultural respect” or family custom rather than doctrinal worship.

3. Historical Perspective

In medieval India, Jains, Hindus, and Buddhists all used overlapping temple and artistic styles.
Some kings patronized both traditions equally (e.g., Chalukyas, Hoysalas).
In inscriptions, Hindu kings sometimes called themselves protectors of Jinas, and Jain donors supported Hindu shrines.

✅ Summary:

Jain–Hindu syncretism is common in practice — shared temples, overlapping deities, festivals, and pilgrimages.
Yes, people do worship across traditions, especially at the popular/local level, though with some doctrinal caution.
Jains emphasize self-effort and non-theism, but in daily life, the boundary between Jain and Hindu religiosity has often been permeable and fluid, especially in India’s shared sacred landscape.

Would you like me to point out some famous temples where Hindus and Jains historically worshipped together (like Khajuraho, Ellora, or mixed-use shrines in Gujarat)?

Yes, please.

Perfect — here are some famous cases of Jain–Hindu temple overlap where worship, architecture, or sacred geography was shared:

1. Ellora Caves (Maharashtra)

The site has 34 rock-cut temples and monasteries:
- Buddhist (caves 1–12)
- Hindu (caves 13–29)
- Jain (caves 30–34)
All were carved between the 6th and 10th centuries CE.
Pilgrims of different traditions visited together; kings patronized all three faiths.
The styles (Śaiva, Vaiṣṇava, Jain) influenced one another heavily.

2. Khajuraho (Madhya Pradesh)

Famous for its erotic sculptures, Khajuraho has Hindu and Jain temples side by side.
Jain temples (like the Pārśvanātha and Ādinātha shrines) are within walking distance of Hindu temples (like Kandariya Mahādeva).
Local worshippers historically flowed between them — today, too, Hindus often visit Jain temples there.

3. Mount Abu – Dilwara Temples (Rajasthan)

Purely Jain temples, but built by Hindu rulers (Chaulukya dynasty).
Hindu artisans also worked on them, and Hindu pilgrims frequently visit to admire and sometimes pray.
The architectural style is indistinguishable from Hindu temple design of the period.

4. Śatrunjaya Hill (Palitana, Gujarat)

Major Jain pilgrimage site with hundreds of temples.
Local Hindus often join the processions, revere the hill, and worship yakṣiṇīs with Hindu-style rituals.
In the wider region, Jains also participate in Hindu festivals at nearby shrines.

5. Śravaṇabelagola (Karnataka)

Home of the giant monolithic statue of Bahubali (Gommaṭeśvara), a key Digambara pilgrimage site.
But Hindu pilgrims also come, seeing Bahubali as a great saint or even an avatāra-like figure.
Kings who sponsored the statue (Ganga dynasty) were Hindu, but strongly patronized Jainism too.

6. Kumbharia Temples (Gujarat)

A cluster of 11th–12th century temples, with Jain shrines alongside Śiva and Viṣṇu temples.
Archaeology shows mixed patronage by Jain merchants and Hindu kings.
Even today, Hindu villagers often visit Jain temples for blessings.

7. Local & Village Shrines

In many rural areas (especially in Rajasthan, Gujarat, Karnataka), a single temple structure historically housed both Hindu and Jain icons.
Example: A shrine might have an image of Ambikā Yakṣiṇī (Jain goddess) next to Durgā (Hindu goddess).
Worshippers addressed them interchangeably, blurring the boundary.

✅ Summary:

At major sites like Ellora, Khajuraho, Mount Abu, Śatrunjaya, Śravaṇabelagola, and many smaller shrines, Hindus and Jains have historically worshipped together or side by side.
Jains maintained doctrinal distinctness (no creator god, emphasis on Jinas), but at the level of ritual and devotion, there has been deep overlap.

Would you like me to also show you how Jain icons were sometimes absorbed into Hindu frameworks (for instance, Bahubali seen as a form of Śiva, or Jinas identified with Viṣṇu’s avatāras)?

Yes, please.

Absolutely — here’s how Jain icons and deities were sometimes absorbed or syncretized with Hindu frameworks, especially in art, popular devotion, and regional practice:

1. Bahubali / Gommaṭeśvara and Śiva

Bahubali, the son of Rishabha (the first Tīrthaṅkara), is depicted as standing in meditation (kayotsarga) or seated, entirely nude (Digambara).
Hindu perception:
- Local Hindus sometimes identified Bahubali with Śiva or a great rishi/ascetic, due to his austere meditation and cosmic significance.
- Temples to Bahubali often adopted Śiva-like architectural motifs (shikhara towers, mandapas) to make the shrine more accessible to Hindu devotees.
Pilgrimage overlap: At Śravaṇabelagola, Hindu and Jain pilgrims climb the hill together.

2. Yakṣiṇīs as Hindu Goddesses

Many Jain Yakṣiṇīs were visually and ritually similar to Hindu goddesses:
- Ambikā (mother of Neminatha, 22nd Tīrthaṅkara) ≈ Durgā / Pārvatī in iconography and function.
  - Both protect devotees, grant fertility, and are depicted with lions or trees.
- Padmāvatī (Yakṣiṇī of Parshvanatha) ≈ Lakṣmī, sometimes depicted with lotus, elephants, and auspicious symbols.
- Temples dedicated to these Yakṣiṇīs often incorporated Hindu-style pūjā rituals, lamps, and festivals.

3. Tīrthaṅkaras and Hindu Avatāras

Some local traditions equate Rishabha (1st Tīrthaṅkara) with Viṣṇu:
- Certain texts identify Rishabha as an avatāra of Viṣṇu, emphasizing his cosmic role.
- This is mostly popular/local syncretism, not canonical Jain doctrine.
In art, Tīrthaṅkara images sometimes appear with Vaishṇava motifs (conch, chakra) to make them recognizable to Hindu devotees.

4. Festivals & Ritual Syncretism

At Paryuṣaṇa or Mahāvīra Jayanti, in some regions:
- Hindu neighbors participate in processions, offer flowers, or light lamps.
- This sometimes led to blending of ritual styles: lamps, bells, and music borrowed from Hindu temple practice.

5. Iconography & Shared Architectural Language

Jain temples often mimic Hindu mandala layouts, garbha-gṛha, and vimāna towers.
Sculptural panels sometimes feature Hindu deities alongside Jinas (Ganesh, Śiva, or Viṣṇu appear at Jain sites for protection and aesthetics).
This was particularly common in Chalukya, Hoysalas, and Solanki-period constructions.

6. Key Takeaways

Doctrinally, Jains never absorbed Hindu gods — Jinas remain supreme in Jainism.
Culturally and ritually, Jain images were often “read” through a Hindu lens by local populations.
This syncretism made temples socially inclusive, allowed shared festivals, and enabled cross-religious patronage by kings and merchants.

✅ Summary:

Bahubali → sometimes perceived as Śiva
Ambikā, Padmāvatī → Hindu-style goddesses
Rishabha → occasionally equated with Viṣṇu
Iconography, architecture, and ritual often borrowed Hindu motifs, allowing Jain sites to function in a Hindu-dominated religious landscape.

If you want, I can make a side-by-side chart of key Jina, Yakṣiṇī, and Hindu correspondences showing which Jains are locally seen as which Hindu deity — it’s a very clear way to visualize this syncretism.

Tuesday, September 16, 2025

All but un-ironically

"To think freely is great, to think the right thoughts is even greater".

The Jewish swastika

Credit: MennasDosbin

So I asked the robot a really "based" question...

Is it true that Jews once used the swastika as a Jewish symbol?

Yes — though it may sound surprising today, there is solid historical evidence that the swastika was sometimes used as a Jewish symbol before it was stigmatized by its Nazi appropriation.

1. Swastika in Antiquity

The swastika is a very ancient symbol, appearing in India, Greece, Rome, Mesopotamia, and early Europe.
It was generally a symbol of good fortune, eternity, or the revolving sun.
Jews living in the Greco-Roman world naturally encountered it and sometimes incorporated it into their own art.

2. Jewish Archaeological Evidence

Synagogues in the Roman/Byzantine era (3rd–6th century CE) sometimes used swastikas in mosaics alongside menorahs, shofars, and other Jewish motifs.
- Example: the Hammat Tiberias Synagogue (4th c. CE, Israel) has swastika patterns in its floor mosaics.
- The Maoz Haim Synagogue and other sites in the Galilee also preserve swastikas as decorative elements.
In these contexts, the swastika was understood as a geometric or solar/life-affirming symbol, not as anything exclusive or “foreign.”

3. Later Uses

Even into the late 19th and early 20th century, before the Nazi era, Jews in Europe and America sometimes used the swastika as a general good-luck symbol, just like non-Jews did.
- Postcards, holiday decorations, and even some early Zionist imagery (rarely) featured it.
It was never the primary Jewish symbol (that role belonged to the Menorah, and later the Star of David), but it could appear in Jewish contexts as a benign emblem of blessing or prosperity.

4. Decline and Taboo

With the rise of Nazism in the 1930s, the swastika became irreversibly associated with antisemitism, genocide, and the Holocaust.
Since then, Jews (and the West in general) abandoned its use, except in historical or archaeological discussion.

✅ Summary:
Yes — archaeological remains from late antiquity show the swastika used in Jewish synagogues as a decorative/life-affirming motif, and even into the early 20th century it sometimes appeared in Jewish cultural contexts as a good-luck sign. Its association with Judaism ended completely after the Nazis adopted it.

Would you like me to pull up some photos of synagogue mosaics with swastikas alongside menorahs, so you can see the evidence directly?

The Charlie Kirk situation

An article from a conspiracist/anti-Zionist on-line publication, summarizing how right-wing groups which opposed Kirk reacted to the assassination. Also references an article by Michael Tracey (who is a gadfly liberal). Interesting content, regardless of what you may think of the groups involved. Connected to the Groyper situation.

The Assassination of Charlie Kirk

Blasphemy

And today we have Woke cancel culture and hate speech laws. And soon, anti-Woke ditto in the wake of a certain recent event. Each time has its own blasphemy, it seems...

Is it true that blasphemy laws existed in the early United States despite the First Amendement?

Yes, it is true that blasphemy laws existed in the early United States even after the ratification of the First Amendment (1791). These laws were primarily at the state level, and they coexisted with federal constitutional protections for freedom of religion and speech. The apparent contradiction stems from the limited scope of the First Amendment in its early interpretation.

🧾 Historical Context

🔹 The First Amendment (1791)

“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof…”

At the time of its adoption, the First Amendment applied only to the federal government.
It did not initially restrict state governments, which continued to enforce their own laws on religion and speech, including blasphemy laws.

⚖️ Examples of Early Blasphemy Laws

1. Massachusetts

Had a blasphemy law as early as the 17th century, carried into the 19th.
In 1838, Abner Kneeland, a freethinker and former Universalist minister, was convicted of blasphemy under Massachusetts law for publishing writings that denied the existence of God.

2. Pennsylvania

Maintained laws criminalizing blasphemy well into the 1800s.
The 1824 case Commonwealth v. Kneeland upheld a blasphemy conviction.

3. Maine and New York

Also had blasphemy statutes on the books during the 18th and 19th centuries.

These laws typically prohibited denial of the Bible, mockery of Jesus, or offensive speech against Christian doctrines.

🧠 Why Were These Laws Possible?

The Bill of Rights, including the First Amendment, was seen as a limitation on federal power only.
States retained the authority to define public morality and regulate religious expression until the 14th Amendment (1868) and its later interpretation in the 20th century.

⚖️ Shift in Legal Doctrine: Incorporation

The “incorporation doctrine” (developed through 20th-century Supreme Court cases) applied most of the Bill of Rights to the states via the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment.
Key decisions:
- Cantwell v. Connecticut (1940) — Incorporated the Free Exercise Clause.
- Joseph Burstyn, Inc. v. Wilson (1952) — Struck down a New York blasphemy law as unconstitutional, recognizing blasphemy bans as violations of free speech.

✅ Summary

Aspect	Explanation
Blasphemy laws existed	Yes, in many U.S. states, especially in the 18th and 19th centuries
First Amendment protection	Initially limited to federal laws only
States could criminalize blasphemy	Until mid-20th century incorporation of the First Amendment
Current status	Blasphemy laws are unenforceable and unconstitutional under modern interpretations of free speech

If you’re interested, I can provide original texts of some early state blasphemy laws or details about famous blasphemy trials in U.S. history.

Details about famous blasphemy trials in US history.

Certainly. Here are some of the most notable blasphemy trials in U.S. history, which illustrate how Christian morality and legal authority shaped early American legal systems—despite the First Amendment—and how courts eventually shifted toward greater freedom of speech and religion.

⚖️ 1. Abner Kneeland (Massachusetts, 1838)

🧑‍🏫 Background:

Abner Kneeland was a former Universalist preacher who became a freethinker, atheist, and publisher.
He founded a secular newspaper, The Boston Investigator, in which he published critiques of Christianity and statements denying God’s existence.

💥 The Charges:

Convicted under the Massachusetts blasphemy statute, which prohibited public statements "contumeliously reproaching" the Christian religion.
Offending quote: He declared that he “did not believe in a God any more than he believed in any other non-existent being.”

⚖️ Verdict and Significance:

Found guilty of blasphemy in 1838 and sentenced to 60 days in jail.
His conviction became a national free speech controversy.
Ralph Waldo Emerson and others defended him as a victim of religious intolerance.

📌 Legacy: Last person jailed for blasphemy in U.S. history. Sparked debate about religious freedom vs. public morality.

⚖️ 2. Ruggles Case (New York, 1811)

(People v. Ruggles, 8 Johns. R. 290 N.Y. 1811)

🧑‍🏫 Background:

John Ruggles, while drunk, gave a public speech in which he denounced Christianity and Jesus in vulgar terms.
He was charged with blasphemy under New York common law, which protected Christian doctrines.

⚖️ Verdict:

Found guilty by the New York Supreme Court, which ruled:

“Christianity is part of the common law... to revile it is to threaten the moral foundations of society.”

📌 Legacy: Landmark case confirming that blasphemy could be prosecuted under common law, even without a written statute. Later overturned by evolving constitutional interpretation.

⚖️ 3. Commonwealth v. Kneeland (Massachusetts, 1838)

Note: This is the official case title of the Abner Kneeland trial. Included here again because it's one of the few well-documented blasphemy prosecutions under a written statute.

⚖️ 4. Joseph Burstyn, Inc. v. Wilson (New York, 1952)

(Also called “The Miracle Decision”)

🧑‍🏫 Background:

A short film by Roberto Rossellini, The Miracle, was accused of being blasphemous by Catholic authorities and banned in New York.
The state’s censorship board revoked its license, citing a law banning sacrilegious content in films.

⚖️ Verdict:

The U.S. Supreme Court struck down the New York law as unconstitutional.
Ruled that "blasphemy is not a valid ground to suppress free expression."

📌 Legacy: This decision ended the enforceability of blasphemy laws in the United States.

⚖️ 5. Kalman v. Cortes (Pennsylvania, 2010)

🧑‍🏫 Background:

A satirical church, "The Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster," challenged Pennsylvania’s ban on blasphemous corporate names after its application was denied.

⚖️ Verdict:

The state eventually revoked the blasphemy clause, recognizing it as unconstitutional under modern free speech law.

📌 Legacy: Confirmed that blasphemy statutes are obsolete under the First Amendment.

📜 Summary Timeline

Year	Case	Outcome
1811	People v. Ruggles (NY)	Blasphemy upheld under common law
1838	Commonwealth v. Kneeland (MA)	Conviction under statute; jailed
1952	Burstyn v. Wilson (SCOTUS)	Blasphemy law struck down
2010	Kalman v. Cortes (PA)	Blasphemy provision repealed

📌 Conclusion

Blasphemy prosecutions were real in early American history, especially in states like Massachusetts and New York, and upheld on the basis of Christian moral order.
These laws gradually eroded due to the expansion of First Amendment protections in the 20th century.
Today, blasphemy laws are unenforceable in the U.S., though some remain on the books in outdated statutes.

Would you like full-text excerpts from any of these trial decisions, or a global comparison of how other countries still enforce blasphemy laws?